Jesus Revolutionized The Role Of Women

In this post, I won’t be telling women to become feminists or to accept the beliefs and philosophies of the feminist and women’s liberation movements.  This is because, I have discovered from reading the Bible that our God has already declared and decreed equal status of women, long before any feminist movement came into being.  It is true that human beings have not followed the teachings of the Bible and this has given rise to false beliefs about women and their ‘place’ in society and in the church.   These false beliefs have also given rise to feminist teachings and the women’s liberation movement, which are good in many ways, but potentially detrimental in other ways.

In Biblical times, women’s status and freedoms were severely limited by Jewish law and customs, as they were in essentially all other cultures at the time. Generally speaking, most women were restricted to roles of little or no authority, they were largely confined to their father’s or husband’s home, and women were considered to be inferior to men and under the authority of men — either to their father before marriage, or to their husband afterwards.

Women were also not allowed to testify in court trials. They could not go out in public, or talk to strangers. When outside of their homes, they were to be double veiled.  They were second-class Jews, excluded from the worship and teaching of God, with status scarcely above that of slaves.

The restrictive conditions for Jewish women may have also prevailed in other cultures.  Generally speaking, over the centuries women have been kept in a position that’s lower than men and have been restricted to traditional roles such as housewife, home maker and care-giver.  This was true, both in the home and also in professions that have been traditionally dominated by women – such as secretaries, nurses, waitresses and so on.

In my reading of the Bible, I see no reference to any commandment or teaching from God that places women in a position that is less than men.  In fact, Jesus did not make any statements about the status of women and I believe that this is because the question of women’s equality with men was not an issue or a problem for Him.

In every interaction Jesus had with women he showed respect and treated them as equals.  His attitude to women was radically different from the traditional beliefs about women in Biblical times.  In Biblical times, women were considered second class citizens.

So let’s look at how Jesus related to women.  He affirmed, honoured and encouraged women in their faith, treated them with dignity, equality and value.  Regardless of their race, culture, age, social status or sin, Jesus only required the women he met to have faith, so that He could minister to them, heal them and allow them to participate in His ministry.  Jesus continually broke with the traditions, religious law and attitudes of the time regarding women.  In fact He radically changed and revolutionized the way in which women were treated.  If Jesus broke wrong traditional beliefs about women and what people thought their role should be, shouldn’t we also break away from traditional beliefs and ideas about the status of women that are contrary to the Biblical examples and teachings on the roles that women are expected to play?

Jesus included women in His ministry.  His only requirement for ministry and discipleship was faith.  Jesus’ disciples included several women, a practice almost unheard of among the rabbis of His day. We read in Luke 8:1-3, Soon afterwards, Jesus began going around from one city and village to another, proclaiming and preaching the kingdom of God. The twelve were with Him, and also some women who had been healed of evil spirits and sicknesses: Mary who was called Magdalene, from whom seven demons had gone out, and Joanna the wife of Chuza, Herod’s steward, and Susanna, and many others who were contributing to their support out of their private means.”  These were women of faith, married, unmarried, of high social standing, of humble means and those who had material wealth.  They all formed part of Jesus’ inner circle, doing His work and serving in His ministry.  

Jesus taught women.  He revealed His truth directly to women. In Jewish tradition, women were not taught with men.  In fact, Christ’s first recorded, explicit disclosure of His own identity as the true Messiah was made to a Samaritan woman.  In John 4:25-26, the woman said to Him, “I know that the Messiah is coming (He who is called Christ); when that One comes, He will declare all things to us.” Jesus said to her, “I who speak to you am He.”  

Another big, liberating truth about Jesus’ view of women is that He encouraged women to go beyond traditionally expected roles such as domestic service and hospitality.  We read in Luke 10:38-42 that Jesus implored Martha to stop being bothered by household chores and follow her sister Mary’s example of listening to His teachings.   It’s not that being hospitable is a bad thing, or that we are to neglect household tasks and only pay attention to Bible study.  I believe that Jesus was liberating Martha and other women from the commonly held social belief that it’s a woman’s place to always do the hospitality and household chores.  So what if you don’t feel called to serve coffee after church service?  Jesus is quite ok with that!

He always treated women with the utmost dignity–even women who might otherwise be regarded as outcasts.  He ignored Jewish laws of ritual impurity when he healed the woman with the hemorrhage and when He blessed and accepted the woman who washed His feet.  He went past cultural differences and prejudices when He ministered to the Samaritan woman at the well who had been married five times and when He delivered the Canaanite woman’s daughter of an evil spirit(See Matthew 9:20-22; Luke 7:37-50; John 4:7-27; John 8:4-11; and Matthew 15:22-28).

As men and women of faith, we need to embrace these truths.

  • God the Father, through Jesus Christ His Son sees women and treats women as equal to men.
  • God the Holy Spirit enables women and men to understand His specific will for you, empowers you to develop your talents and to serving effectively in ministry.
  • Women of faith are not in the back row.  Women are to come boldly forward and do God’s work, as we are directed by God to serve Him and the world.

This is who we are.  This is who God wants Christian women of faith to be, and how He wants Christian men of faith to see their spiritual sisters, wives and daughters.

Published by Camille Isaacs-Morell

Enabling businesses and people to be successful. This is my mission, my life’s work. It’s always been what I have done wherever I’ve been employed, called to serve or to volunteer. An experienced business leader, my core values are truth, integrity, and respect. I believe that values-based leadership is critical for organizational success that is enabled by an engaged and empowered workforce. Working over the years in several senior marketing, communications, and executive leadership mandates for global, financial, healthcare, and non-profit organizations, it has been through times of transformation and difficult change that I have done my best work. In my blog posts, I share my perspectives on leadership, marketing and strategy that are based on my key learnings and observations over the years, all with the objective of helping others reach for success. In my spare time, I enjoy the beauty of nature which I reproduce in my pastel paintings.

4 thoughts on “Jesus Revolutionized The Role Of Women

  1. I am not a christian so m not very knowledgeable about bible, but does bible not say in some ways that a man is the head of the family? Don’t the marriage ceremonies call for women to “obey?”

    1. Aish Pandey, thanks for your comment and question. This is a very difficult topic for many Christians and non-Christians alike.

      It is true that in the New Testament Paul teaches that wives are to submit to husbands, that the man is the head of the woman in marriage. My own view is that Paul’s intention was to bring order to Christian congregations that were experiencing problems at that time. By defining roles and responsibilities for men and women to follow, Paul intended that harmonious relationships in marriage, family and in the church would be established. I do not believe that women are by any means marginalized or relegated to any second-class status in the Bible – either in the Old Testament or in the New Testament and even within Paul’s Epistles. I support my opinion because of what Paul says and does in regard to women and their role in his ministry.

      He says in Galatians 3:28 that there is no distinction between male and female and we are all one / equal in the sight of God.

      Paul included women in his ministry. He cites several examples of women who ministered alongside him – Euodia and Syntyche (Philippians 4:2), Phoebe the deaconess in Cenchreae (Romans 16:1) and Prisca and Aquila who risked their lives for Paul in spreading the gospel (Romans 16 v4).
       There are also many other examples of women ministering with Paul and who he commends for serving in positions of leadership and influence in the early church. A fairly complete list is in Romans Chapter 16.

      Finally, in the first marriage between Adam and Eve, In Genesis 2:18 God said that Eve was to be a ‘helper’ to Adam. Contrary to our usual understanding of the word ‘helper’, that implies ‘provider of assistance’ to someone else, the word ‘helper’ is translated from the Hebrew word ‘ezer’ which means ‘power’ or ‘strength.’

      So in Genesis 2:18 where Eve is to be a helper to Adam, I would say that God intended that in marriage, Eve would offer “power” or “strength” to Adam as an equal partner. As a ‘helper’, a wife is not to be thought of as second rung at all, but rather as a divine gift, key to humanity’s survival.

      I hope my comments are helpful and provide the clarifications you need.,

      1. Your comments are really positive and I would be the happiest person on earth if everyone on earth knew these facts, I suppose the problems i indicated in my previous comment are perceivable more as a subject of “gender bias”. I really do hope the correct meaning is conveyed by the seemingly biased practices. Thanks a lot.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: